
The tesa Holospot can save up to 1
kilobyte data in one unique pattern. (JPG, 945 x 1023 px,
339 KB)

The tiny forgery-proof label contains the Nivea logo and an individual
serial number as well as another covert information. (JPG, 1535 x
1535 px,
524 KB)

Data can be read out by magnifying
glasses or special reading devices. (JPG, 2312 x 1535 px,
514 KB) |
|
Original or fake? The finicky picture puzzle that
magazines use to please their readers is more and more becoming
a synonym for an offence equally global and lucrative: product
piracy. In Russia alone according to information provided by the
Ministry of the Interior manufacturers of brand name products suffer
losses amounting to between three and five billion Euro annually.
By introducing the new tesa Holospot system, a security technology
by tesa scribos GmbH, a subsidiary of tesa AG, Russian counterfeiters
of Nivea products could now be put out of business. An example
that could set a precedent.
Deceivingly similar
The „Deutsche Industrie- und Handelstag – DIHK“ (German
Association of Chambers of Commerce and Trade) estimates the
worldwide losses arising from product piracy at roughly 500 billion
Euro annually. Apart from China also Russia in particular is
regarded as a professional multi-copy plant of profitable goods.
Since quite some time product piracy is no longer limited to
luxury time pieces, sporting goods and designer clothes.
According to information by the Directorate General for Taxes
and Customs Duty of the European Commission also the cosmetics
and toiletries industry is increasingly being focussed by the
product pirates. The industry has suffered from an increase of
incidents by 800 percent in 2003 compared to 2002. Primarily
top-selling brands enjoying high reputation like Nivea are being
copied by the criminal Russian counterfeiters. In 2003 the first
fakes of Nivea Hair Care products appeared in the Russian market
place. A market survey conducted locally revealed a fake quota
of more than 30 percent by beginning of 2004. Packaging was copied
so well that even insiders like the former CEO of Beiersdorf
AG, Dr. Rolf Kunisch, could no longer distinguish them from the
original. Losses in the millions and the concern for the brand
reputation of Nivea in particular led to the adoption of a new
security system: the tesa Holospot technology. Starting from
the second quarter of 2004 Beiersdorf AG had its Nivea products
meant for sale in Russia marked with the tiny only 1 square millimetre
small security holograms of the tesa affiliate from Heidelberg.
Keeping track of the culprits
The tiny forgery-proof labels that can save up to 1 kilobyte
in information contained the Nivea logo and an individual serial
number as well as another covert information. The Russian distribution
partner could only verify the authenticity of the Nivea products
by checking the logo and the serial number with a magnifying
glass.
Furthermore, retailers were informed of the existence of another
coded information level. With these covert data only accessible
to authorised individuals the supply chain can be retraced over
several steps. In addition to these measures Beiersdorf AG established
a telephone hotline to immediately answer questions with regard
to the authenticity of Nivea products. Moreover, an international
security company was hired to control the success and for the
identification of criminals.
100 percent success
During the use of the tesa Holospot system the frequency of fakes
encountered was checked continuously. After roughly one year
not a single faked Nivea Hair Care product was found in the
market place. Turnover increased by over 40 percent and for
the first time it became possible again to advertise the affected
Nivea products. Advertising had been discontinued in 2004 in
order not to let the product pirates benefit from increased
demand. With a unique combination of effective fake protection
technology and tightly focused field investigation – another
of the fundamental corner stones of the security strategy implemented – imitations
could be prevented within a year’s time.
Back
to archive
|